IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mag/wpaper/25004.html

Availability of AI tools and their effect on the auditing process

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Robert Schoendube

  • Barbara Schoendube-Pirchegger

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg)

Abstract

In this paper we model the interaction between an auditor and a client firm. The client firm’s manager can either report truthfully or commit fraud. The auditor needs to plan a two stage audit that allows to detect fraud. In the first stage an AI tool is employed that provides a signal about the quality of the client’s internal control system (ICS). Classifying the ICS as weak or strong, the signal alters the auditor’s expectations regarding the client’s fraud probability. In the second stage, the auditor decides about her audit effort conditional on the information provided by the AI. Comparing the AI setting to a benchmark setting without AI use, we find that employing the AI tool reduces the manager’s incentives to commit fraud. At the same time it reduces the equilibrium effort provided by the auditor. As a consequence, the probability that actual fraud is detected remains unchanged. We extend our model and allow the AI tool to be customized such that it can either focus on detection of the weak ICS, the strong ICS, or on both equally. We find that the AI specification that minimizes ex ante probability for fraud not necessarily coincides with the specification that minimizes auditing costs. It follows that the auditor in charge of customizing the AI cannot necessarily be expected to do so in a fraud minimizing way.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Robert Schoendube & Barbara Schoendube-Pirchegger, 2025. "Availability of AI tools and their effect on the auditing process," FEMM Working Papers 25004, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:25004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.fww.ovgu.de/fww_media/femm/femm_2025/2025_04.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Reed Smith & Samuel L. Tiras & Sansakrit S. Vichitlekarn, 2000. "The Interaction between Internal Control Assessment and Substantive Testing in Audits for Fraud," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 327-356, June.
    2. Young K. Kwon, 2005. "Accounting Conservatism and Managerial Incentives," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(11), pages 1626-1632, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jeroen Suijs, 2008. "On the Value Relevance of Asymmetric Financial Reporting Policies," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(5), pages 1297-1321, December.
    2. Sebastian Kronenberger & Volker Laux, 2022. "Conservative Accounting, Audit Quality, and Litigation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 2349-2362, March.
    3. Laux, Volker & Ray, Korok, 2020. "Effects of accounting conservatism on investment efficiency and innovation," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1).
    4. Langberg, Nisan & Sivaramakrishnan, K., 2008. "Voluntary disclosures and information production by analysts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 78-100, September.
    5. Sezen Uludag, 2016. "The importance of control environment in an organization for an independent auditor to determine nature,timing, and extent of substantive tests: An application in Turkey," Journal of Administrative and Business Studies, Professor Dr. Usman Raja, vol. 2(6), pages 294-303.
    6. Dea¡¯a Al-Deen Omar Al-Sraheen & Faudziah Hanim Fadzil & Syed Soffian Bin Syed Ismail, 2014. "Does Corporate Governance Matter? Evidence from Accounting Conservatism Practices among Jordanian Listed Companies," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 4(4), pages 64-80, December.
    7. Budde, Jörg, 2013. "Verifiable and Nonverifiable Information in a Two-Period Agency Problem," Discussion Paper Series of SFB/TR 15 Governance and the Efficiency of Economic Systems 445, Free University of Berlin, Humboldt University of Berlin, University of Bonn, University of Mannheim, University of Munich.
    8. Hui Chen & Bjorn N. Jorgensen, 2018. "Market Exit Through Divestment—The Effect of Accounting Bias on Competition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 164-177, January.
    9. Li, Keming & Nishikawa, Takeshi & Rao, Ramesh P., 2025. "Does the threat of short selling discipline management? Evidence from default risk changes around regulation SHO," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    10. Yim, Andrew, 2010. "Fraud Detection and Financial Reporting and Audit Delay," MPRA Paper 27857, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Laux, Christian & Laux, Volker, 2024. "Accounting conservatism and managerial information acquisition," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(2).
    12. Hyoungsik Noh, 2023. "Conservativeness in jury decision-making," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 95(1), pages 151-172, July.
    13. Listyorini Wahyu Widati & Bambang Sudiyatno & Titiek Suwarti & Kis Indriyaningrum, 2025. "An Empirical Study of the Impact of Accounting Conservatism and Ownership Structure on Firm Performance in Indonesia," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 13(2), pages 266-278, April.
    14. Christopher Bleibtreu & Ulrike Stefani, 2024. "The interdependence between market structure and the quality of audited reports: the case of non-audit services," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 1524-1574, June.
    15. Chun-Hung Chen, 2025. "Optimizing Accounting and Wage Design: A Principal-Centric Approach to Solving the Agency Problem," International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, International Journal of Finance, Insurance and Risk Management, vol. 15(3), pages 130-158.
    16. Ralf Ewert & Alfred Wagenhofer, 2019. "Effects of Increasing Enforcement on Financial Reporting Quality and Audit Quality," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 57(1), pages 121-168, March.
    17. Evelyn Patterson & David Wright, 2003. "Evidence of Fraud, Audit Risk and Audit Liability Regimes," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 105-131, March.
    18. Francis, Bill B. & Hasan, Iftekhar & Hovakimian, Gayane & Sharma, Zenu, 2023. "Gender pay gap in American CFOs: Theory and evidence," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    19. Charles J. Coates & Robert E. Florence & Kristi L. Kral, 2002. "Financial Statement Audits,a Game of Chicken?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 1-11, November.
    20. Fabio B. Gaertner & Asad Kausar & Logan B. Steele, 2020. "Negative accounting earnings and gross domestic product," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 1382-1409, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:25004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IT Administrators at FWW (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwmagde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.