IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/mag/wpaper/24005.html

Analytical Planning Stability Research: No Reason for Nervousness!

Author

Listed:
  • Karl Inderfurth

    (Faculty of Economics and Management, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg)

Abstract

Planning stability or its counterpart, planning nervousness, is a challenging issue for many companies as well as for scientists who try to analyze and explain this phenomenon. Research in this area mainly concentrates on the field of production and materials planning where current replanning activities contribute to nervousness. For a long period, this research only consisted of descriptive or simulation-based work. Since the middle 1990s, however, we also find analytical approaches which provide direct mathematical insights into the effects of the choice of different inventory control rules and their parameters on the size of planning stability. Only a handful of such contributions on nervousness yet have been published and can be evaluated here. This lack of research may be caused by major technical challenges connected with this type of analysis. The findings from these papers, though restricted to quite simple planning environments, provide deep and general insights which can be used for managerial decision making. These insights could be further extended and generalized if some more complex planning situations, which up to now are only treated in simulation studies, would be investigated with analytical methods. Against the background of potential findings, it would be highly desirable if ambitious researchers could be motivated to take on this job without nervousness and hesitation despite all cumbersome mathematical effort.

Suggested Citation

  • Karl Inderfurth, 2024. "Analytical Planning Stability Research: No Reason for Nervousness!," FEMM Working Papers 24005, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:24005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.fww.ovgu.de/fww_media/femm/femm_2024/2024_05.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph D. Blackburn & Dean H. Kropp & Robert A. Millen, 1986. "A Comparison of Strategies to Dampen Nervousness in MRP Systems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 413-429, April.
    2. de Kok, Ton & Inderfurth, Karl, 1997. "Nervousness in inventory management: Comparison of basic control rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 55-82, November.
    3. Jensen, Thomas, 1993. "Measuring and improving planning stability of reorder-point lot-sizing policies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 167-178, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. van Donselaar, K. & van den Nieuwenhof, J. & Visschers, J., 2000. "The impact of material coordination concepts on planning stability in supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 169-176, November.
    2. Heisig, Gerald, 2001. "Comparison of (s,S) and (s,nQ) inventory control rules with respect to planning stability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 59-82, August.
    3. de Kok, Ton & Inderfurth, Karl, 1997. "Nervousness in inventory management: Comparison of basic control rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 55-82, November.
    4. Sivadasan, Suja & Smart, Janet & Huaccho Huatuco, Luisa & Calinescu, Anisoara, 2013. "Reducing schedule instability by identifying and omitting complexity-adding information flows at the supplier–customer interface," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 253-262.
    5. Kilic, Onur A. & Tarim, S. Armagan, 2011. "An investigation of setup instability in non-stationary stochastic inventory systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(1), pages 286-292, September.
    6. Demirel, Edil & Özelkan, Ertunga C. & Lim, Churlzu, 2018. "Aggregate planning with Flexibility Requirements Profile," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 45-58.
    7. Tarim, S. Armagan & Kingsman, Brian G., 2006. "Modelling and computing (Rn, Sn) policies for inventory systems with non-stationary stochastic demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(1), pages 581-599, October.
    8. Özen, Ulaş & Doğru, Mustafa K. & Armagan Tarim, S., 2012. "Static-dynamic uncertainty strategy for a single-item stochastic inventory control problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 348-357.
    9. Friederike Wall, 2024. "Incomplete incentive contracts in complex task environments: an agent-based simulation with minimal intelligence agents," Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, Springer;Society for Economic Science with Heterogeneous Interacting Agents, vol. 19(3), pages 523-552, July.
    10. Salewski, Frank & Nissen, Rüdiger, 1993. "Revidierende hierarchische Planung: Ein Konzept am Beispiel der Personaleinsatzplanung in Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaften," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 335, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    11. Sahin, Funda & Powell Robinson, E. & Gao, Li-Lian, 2008. "Master production scheduling policy and rolling schedules in a two-stage make-to-order supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 528-541, October.
    12. Ghobbar, Adel A. & Friend, Chris H., 2004. "The material requirements planning system for aircraft maintenance and inventory control: a note," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 217-221.
    13. Meixell, Mary J., 2005. "The impact of setup costs, commonality, and capacity on schedule stability: An exploratory study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 95-107, January.
    14. Peidro, David & Mula, Josefa & Jiménez, Mariano & del Mar Botella, Ma, 2010. "A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 65-80, August.
    15. Daniel Thiel, 1998. "Mise en évidence de l'instabilité des modèles de réapprovisionnement continu par une analyse dynamique des systèmes logistiques," Économie rurale, Programme National Persée, vol. 245(1), pages 56-68.
    16. Narayanan, Arunachalam & Robinson, Powell, 2010. "Evaluation of joint replenishment lot-sizing procedures in rolling horizon planning systems," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(1), pages 85-94, September.
    17. Roberto Rossi & S. Tarim & Brahim Hnich & Steven Prestwich, 2012. "Constraint programming for stochastic inventory systems under shortage cost," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 49-71, May.
    18. van Donselaar, K. H. & Gubbels, B. J., 2002. "How to release orders in order to minimise system inventory and system nervousness?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 335-343, August.
    19. Carlos Herrera & Sana Belmokhtar-Berraf & André Thomas & Víctor Parada, 2016. "A reactive decision-making approach to reduce instability in a master production schedule," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(8), pages 2394-2404, April.
    20. Roberto Rossi & S. Armagan Tarim & Ramesh Bollapragada, 2012. "Constraint-Based Local Search for Inventory Control Under Stochastic Demand and Lead Time," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 66-80, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mag:wpaper:24005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: IT Administrators at FWW (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwmagde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.