Is Injury Compensation Excessive?
There is widely perceived to be a public liability crisis in Australia. This paper analyses whether court awards for injuries are excessive. The paper has two main parts. The first part outlines a normative basis for the sizes of awards based on the principles of welfare economics and the amounts that individuals would be willing to pay to avoid injuries. It shows the kinds of compensation sums that would be involved for 28 typical injuries ranging from broken arms and legs to quadriplegia and severe brain damage. The second part of the paper analyses 397 court awards for injuries greater than $250 000 in NSW from 1991 to mid-2002, for which award details were readily available. This includes 101 awards for traffic accidents, 64 awards for workers compensation, and 27 awards for personal injury. The paper concludes that court awards are generally not excessive.
|Date of creation:||Jul 2003|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Sydney NSW 2109|
Web page: http://www.econ.mq.edu.au/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mac:wpaper:0306. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Helen Boneham)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.