Sustainability in the tropics: does a boom in deforestation lead to a bust in development?
We revisit the hypothesis tested in Rodrigues et al. (2009) that the process of human development in Amazonia follows a boom-and-bust (inverted U) pattern. We showthat the 'boombust' pattern that Rodrigues et al. report is a spurious artefact of spatial correlation, driven primarily by the large, multifaceted (and unobserved) differences between municipalities in and around Amazonas and Maranhï¿½o states. We confirm these (non-) results in the time series data; there is no ï¿½smoking gunï¿½ dynamic boom and bust associated with land clearing in any municipality data from 1980 to 2000. Furthermore, the past economic performance of municipalities categorised asï¿½postfrontierï¿½ by Rodrigues et al. themselves are shown to have been economic underperformers since the 1970s, and if anything they have improved their relative economic standing in the years since 2000. In sum, we find no evidence in either the cross section or the time series data of any ï¿½boombustï¿½ patterns of development in the Brazilian Amazon.
|Date of creation:||May 2012|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE|
Phone: +44 (020) 7405 7686
Web page: http://www.lse.ac.uk/grantham.
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (The GRI Administration)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.