IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/liu/liuced/94.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Razionalità limitata e regole contrattuali: promesse e problemi della nuova analisi economica del diritto

Author

Abstract

Today Behavioral Law and Economics is the most ambitious attempt to overcome one of the main limits of Law and Economics, that is the recourse to a model of rationality which is little supported by empirical evidence. However, such an attempt relies exclusively on the idea of "cognitive bias" developed by cognitive psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. From a normative point of view, the implications of that approach are debatable. The paper proposes to look at psychological schools which show stronger links with the original notion of bounded rationality introduced by Herbert Simon. Among these schools, evolutionary psychology rejects the comparison between observed behavior and the axioms of perfect rationality and tries to find out the factors that ease, obstruct or interact with the decision-making process. The differences between the perspective of Behavioral Law and Economics and other psychological approaches are explored in the field of contract law. Moreover, additional considerations are developed on the comparison between the bounded rationality of public and private organizations and its consequences for the allocation of decision-making authority.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Bellantuono, 2001. "Razionalità limitata e regole contrattuali: promesse e problemi della nuova analisi economica del diritto," LIUC Papers in Ethics, Law and Economics 94, Cattaneo University (LIUC).
  • Handle: RePEc:liu:liuced:94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.biblio.liuc.it/liucpap/pdf/94.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:liu:liuced:94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Laura Ballestra). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/liuccit.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.