IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lis/liswps/553.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Income Inequality and Wage Differentials: A Comparison between the United States and Guatemala

Author

Listed:
  • Ashley Owings

Abstract

With the current economic transformation, the widening gap between income and the accumulation of wealth becomes an important area of study. This study reviews wage differentials and a number of economic theories regarding wage determination and labor market incentives. To analyze the wage differential, the study examines empirical data from the United States and Guatemala across income levels via the Luxembourg Income Study data sets. The econometric model proposed examines multiple factors influencing wage rates at the household level including levels of education, household demographics, additional forms of income, transfers, and rates of taxation. Considering the different levels of development between the countries, the empirical data for Guatemala can be compared to the United States and analyzed to ascertain areas of focus to further develop Guatemala’s economy by focusing on increasing gains in education and access of public resources across Guatemala.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashley Owings, 2010. "Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Income Inequality and Wage Differentials: A Comparison between the United States and Guatemala," LIS Working papers 553, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
  • Handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/liswps/553.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lis:liswps:553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piotr Paradowski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lisprlu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.