IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lie/dpaper/40.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Public-Private Sector Wage Gap in Lithuania: Evidence from Social Security Data

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Garcia-Louzao

    (Bank of Lithuania, Vilnius University, and CESifo)

  • Karolina JonuÅ¡kaitÄ—

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

This paper estimates high-dimensional fixed effects models using detailed administrative data to characterize the public-private wage gap in Lithuania between 2010 and 2020. We document that public sector employees earn on average 10% more than their private sector counterparts. However, when comparing firm-specific wage effects, the gap almost disappears, with public sector employers paying a 0.3% lower premium. Interestingly, women benefit from working in the public sector, as they have a 16% premium due to both being employed by organizations with higher premiums and having higher returns to individual-specific components relative to women in private firms. In contrast, men have higher returns to unobserved permanent heterogeneity, which are particularly high for public sector workers, but they are with employers that have lower premiums relative to men in the private sector, resulting in an observed public sector premium of 4%. Our results highlight the importance of using mobility across firms, not just across sectors, and of isolating firm-specific wage components from other sources of wage variation to properly understand pay differentials across employers with different wage-setting protocols.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Garcia-Louzao & Karolina JonuÅ¡kaitÄ—, 2025. "The Public-Private Sector Wage Gap in Lithuania: Evidence from Social Security Data," Bank of Lithuania Discussion Paper Series 40, Bank of Lithuania.
  • Handle: RePEc:lie:dpaper:40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.lb.lt/uploads/publications/docs/49484_4500ad581a0c1aba3bfd63b123013389.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lie:dpaper:40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aurelija Proskute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/lbanklt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.