Views of European Races among the Research Staff of the US Immigration Commission and the Census Bureau, ca. 1910
This paper discusses support for, and opposition to, racial classification of European immigrants among high-level researchers at both the United States Immigration Commission of 1907-11 (the Dillingham Commission) and the Census Bureau during those same years. A critical distinction must be made between the Commission members-political appointees who mostly supported some form of restriction at the time of their appointment-and the top research staff, whose views were remarkably wide ranging. Moreover, even staff members committed to a racialized outlook-such as Daniel Folkmar, author of the Commission's infamous Dictionary of Races and Peoples-deserve a closer look than historians have given them; for example, Folkmar and his superior on the staff had requested commentary from Franz Boas, who was then emerging as the most prestigious academic critic of racial theories (theories that assume group differences in behavior arise from biological endowments). Another feature of the narrative concerns the surprising number of staff who transferred from the Commission to the Census Bureau to work on the 1910 Census. Debates continued at the Bureau as well, this time over how to present the results of the new "mother tongue" question, which had been introduced to the Census questionnaire in response to pressure for a European "race" question. Indeed, Folkmar was also the chief author of the Census Bureau report on the mother-tongue data.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lev:wrkpap:wp_648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Marie-Celeste Edwards)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.