IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lee/wpaper/1411.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Cost of crime: a systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Nyantara Wickramasekera

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Sandy Tubeuf

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Judy Wright

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Helen Elsey

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Jenni Murray

    (Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

Abstract

Background: Crime imposes significant costs and negative consequences to people and society globally. Understanding the cost of crime is important to conduct economic evaluations of existing crime prevention interventions and to allocate resources by prioritizing crime prevention efforts relative to the severity of the crime category. Aim: The aim of this review is to systematically search the literature to select and review all existing and relevant studies that have estimated the cost of crime. Methods: In December 2013, fifteen databases were systematically searched for published studies and grey literature. We included studies that estimated the costs of crime of adult offenders. Due to high heterogeneity, results were synthesised descriptively. Results: 21 studies met the inclusion criteria, of these 14 studies estimated the societal cost of crime, six studies focused on victim costs, and one study calculated the costs imposed by ‘career’ offenders. There was considerable variance in the estimated total costs of crime and studies from the United States consistently reported the highest total costs. Different crime categories were used to estimate the total cost of crime but all the studies consistently included robbery and burglary in the total cost estimate. Homicide was ranked as the most costly offence, followed by drug offence, fraud, sexual assault, assault, and serious traffic offence. Crime categories that involved any violence to a person were consistently associated with large intangible costs. Conclusions: This systematic review found several studies that estimated the cost of crime spread across different developed countries. However, we found large variance in the total cost estimate between studies. While it is difficult to precisely determine what caused this variance, we think that it could be due to changes in unit costs, underreporting of crime, changes in crime trends, inconsistent definitions of crime categories, and variations in the methods used to estimate costs. The findings from this systematic review highlight the need for more up-to-date studies with better reporting standards.

Suggested Citation

  • Nyantara Wickramasekera & Sandy Tubeuf & Judy Wright & Helen Elsey & Jenni Murray, 2014. "Cost of crime: a systematic review," Working Papers 1411, Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds.
  • Handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/download/1381/auhe_wp14_11
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    crime; cost;

    JEL classification:

    • H43 - Public Economics - - Publicly Provided Goods - - - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
    • I38 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Government Programs; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Judy Wright (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/heleeuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.