IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lee/wpaper/1104.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Systematic Review of Economic Models in Stroke Care Pathways

Author

Listed:
  • David M Meads

    () (Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Claire Hulme

    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds)

  • Anne Forster

    (Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford)

  • Elizabeth Teale

    (Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford)

  • John Young

    (Academic Unit of Elderly Care and Rehabilitation, Bradford Institute for Health Research, Bradford Royal Infirmary, Bradford)

Abstract

Background: the importance of evidence-based care pathways in stroke have been highlighted by recently published national guidelines. However, little research has focused on identifying which components of the care pathway are cost-effective. Objectives: To search the published literature to identify approaches that would circumvent methodological problems and allow economic evaluations of stroke care pathways. Methods: eight literature databases were searched for studies from 1999 to Feb 2010 using standard health economic evaluation terms, stroke terms and terms relating to care pathways and care processes. Studies reporting evaluations of more than one stroke care process concurrently were considered for review. Results: Very few studies met the inclusion criteria as most evaluations focused on discrete, individual interventions. Five studies were selected for review. The most promising approach to care pathway analysis using traditional modelling was to alter parameters for individual care processes and observe the impact on care pathway output. A promising alternative approach was discrete event simulation of the whole care pathway which allows representation of timing and competition for resources. Conclusions: cost-effectiveness of individual care processes should be established to aid distribution of resources effectively along the pathway. A comparison of Markov and simulation modelling in stroke is required to determine the most appropriate approach for analysing the care pathway.

Suggested Citation

  • David M Meads & Claire Hulme & Anne Forster & Elizabeth Teale & John Young, 2011. "A Systematic Review of Economic Models in Stroke Care Pathways," Working Papers 1104, Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds.
  • Handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/download/249/auhe_wp11_04
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G Torrance & Y Zhang & D Feeny & W Furlong & R Barr, 1992. "Multi-attribute Utility Functions for a Comprehensive Health Status Classification System: Health Utilities Index Mark 2," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 1992-18, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Judy Wright) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/heleeuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.