IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/lee/wpaper/1103.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Challenges in modelling censored health state preference data: Explorations with the EQ-5D and HUI2

Author

Listed:
  • Chantelle Browne

    () (Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds)

  • Roberta Longo

    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds)

  • Richard Edlin

    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds)

  • Jennifer Roberts

    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds)

  • Christopher McCabe

    (Academic Unit of Health Economics, University of Leeds)

Abstract

Background - There are now a variety of preference based health related quality of life measures available. These instruments describe health in different terms and also use different methods for measuring individual preferences for health. Whilst these instruments have been shown to have acceptable psychometric properties, they have also been shown to be affected by ceiling and/or floor effects. The presence of ceiling effects in the health descriptive system are of particular concern for health state preference modelling as it may impact upon the likelihood of observing censoring and/or compression. Where appropriate methodologies are available to deal with these problems, it is methodologically preferable to use them. In this paper we assess the impact of adopting Tobit models to deal with potential censoring in two datasets – the MVH EQ-5D data and the UK HUI2 health state preference data. In doing so, we will show the impact on estimated values and expected fit. Methods - For each dataset we estimate a generalised least squares model with random effects and a tobit random effects model. The specification of each utility function is equivalent to those in the original publications (Dolan 1997, McCabe et al 2005). For each model we report the estimated coefficients, the Mean Absolute Error (MAE), the Mean Square Error (MSE), the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), the proportion of states where the absolute prediction error was greater than 0.1 and the correlation between observed and predicted values. Results - Censoring problems were found in the MVH EQ-5D data but not in the UK HUI2 data set. As expected the impact of adjusting for censoring is very different between the two datasets. Conclusion – The impact of taking account of potential censoring is much greater in the EQ-5D data than the HUI2 data. Although the EQ-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D 5L) will reduce the ceiling effect in the EQ-5D 3 Level (EQ-5D 3L), this will not provide a solution to the issue of censoring without a full re-estimation of utilities for all the health states it measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Chantelle Browne & Roberta Longo & Richard Edlin & Jennifer Roberts & Christopher McCabe, 2011. "Challenges in modelling censored health state preference data: Explorations with the EQ-5D and HUI2," Working Papers 1103, Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds.
  • Handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://medhealth.leeds.ac.uk/download/248/auhe_wp11_03
    File Function: First version, 2011
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G Torrance & Y Zhang & D Feeny & W Furlong & R Barr, 1992. "Multi-attribute Utility Functions for a Comprehensive Health Status Classification System: Health Utilities Index Mark 2," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series 1992-18, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lee:wpaper:1103. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Judy Wright). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/heleeuk.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.