IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/laf/wpaper/cr1602.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Vertical Differentiation, Uncertainty, Product R&D and Policy Instruments in a North-South Duopoly

Author

Listed:
  • Julien Berthoumieu

    (Larefi, Université de Bordeaux)

  • Viola Lamani

    (Larefi, Université de Bordeaux)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the impact of several trade policy instruments on product Research and Development (R&D) investment in a North-South duopoly where a Northern firm competes in prices with a Southern firm on both markets. The Northern firm invests in product R&D owing to a competitive disadvantage compared to the Southern firm which benefits from a lower labor cost. The outcome of the R&D activity is uncertain. If successful, vertical differentiation occurs in both markets. The Northern country’s government is the only one policy active and may implement the following trade policy instruments: an import tariff, a production subsidy, an R&D subsidy, a standard of quality, a minimum-price, and an import quota. The results show that the Northern firm’s R&D expenditures increase with each policy instrument except for the import quota. The paper also provides a welfare analysis in order to verify whether or not the Northern government is encouraged to implement these policy instruments.

Suggested Citation

  • Julien Berthoumieu & Viola Lamani, 2016. "Vertical Differentiation, Uncertainty, Product R&D and Policy Instruments in a North-South Duopoly," Larefi Working Papers 1602, Larefi, Université Bordeaux 4.
  • Handle: RePEc:laf:wpaper:cr1602
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://lare-efi.u-bordeaux4.fr/IMG/pdf/CR16-EFI_02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Trade Policy Instruments; Product Research and Development; North-South Duopoly; Vertical Differentiation. JEL Classifications: F13; O30.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:laf:wpaper:cr1602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Cyril Mesmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/labrdfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.