Quality Indicators: in Theory and in Fact
In recent literature, it has been suggested that consumers need have no knowledge of product quality as a number of quality indicators (or signals) may be used as substitutes. Very little attention has been paid to the empirical verification of these studies. The present paper is devoted to the issue of how well these indicators perform, using market data provided by consumer magazines from three countries. The results strongly indicate that price is a poor quality indicator. The paper also presents some evidence that suggests that seller reputation and easily observable characteristics are also poor indicators.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||Jun 1988|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in: European Economic Review, 1991, 35(8) pp 1491-1505|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Øster Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark|
Phone: (+45) 35 32 30 10
Fax: +45 35 32 30 00
Web page: http://www.econ.ku.dk
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:8808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Thomas Hoffmann)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.