IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kud/kuiedp/0007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the Welfare Economic Foundations of Health Status Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Leth Hougaard

    (Copenhagen Business School, Department of Operations Management)

  • Hans Keiding

    (University of Copenhagen, Institute of Economics)

Abstract

Measures of health status, such as e.g. the QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Years) measure, have been proposed as a tool in the economic assessment of new medical technologies, and its possible foundations in individual utility theory have been discussed in the literature. However, the problems of aggregation or interpersonal utility comparison inherent in the application of such measures has went largely unnoticed. In the present work, we consider a general equilibrium model of a society, where different aspects of health are identified as Lancasterian characteristics. In this model, we consider the welfare theoretical basis for evaluation of changes of allocation from a Pareto optimum, and in particular, we investigate conditions on the economy under which the individuals will have the same marginal rates of substitution between characteristics, which is a precondition for a meaningful measurement of health status. It turns out that this equality will obtain only under very restrictive conditions of separability in characteristics production.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Leth Hougaard & Hans Keiding, 2000. "On the Welfare Economic Foundations of Health Status Measures," Discussion Papers 00-07, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:0007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.ku.dk/english/research/publications/wp/2000/0007.pdf/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    QALYs; Consumers' characteristics; General equilibrium;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D6 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics
    • I0 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:0007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Hoffmann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/okokudk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.