IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/koe/wpaper/2611.html

Optimal cross-holdings and upstream R&D

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Hu

    (Kansai University)

  • Tomomichi Mizuno

    (Kobe University)

Abstract

While cross-holdings are widely observed, their degree varies across industries. We show that upstream R&D is one possible reason. In a vertically related market with two downstream firms and an upstream firm engaging in cost-reducing R&D, the cross-holding rate is determined through Nash bargaining. The equilibrium rate maximizes downstream joint profit and is always below the merger level. An interior optimum exists only when upstream R&D is sufficiently inefficient, and the rate decreases with R&D efficiency and market size. In the linear-quadratic case, any degree of cross-holdings can arise. Since total surplus falls with cross-holdings, the private optimum is socially excessive, justifying antitrust intervention.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Hu & Tomomichi Mizuno, 2026. "Optimal cross-holdings and upstream R&D," Discussion Papers 2611, Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
    • Handle: RePEc:koe:wpaper:2611
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.kobe-u.ac.jp/RePEc/koe/wpaper/2026/2611.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matthew J. Clayton & Bjorn N. Jorgensen, 2005. "Optimal Cross Holding with Externalities and Strategic Interactions," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(4), pages 1505-1522, July.
    2. David Gilo & Yossi Moshe & Yossi Spiegel, 2006. "Partial cross ownership and tacit collusion," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 37(1), pages 81-99, March.
    3. Yake Jin & Arijit Mukherjee & Chenhang Zeng, 2024. "Downstream Cross‐Holdings and Upstream R&D: A Comment," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(4), pages 1360-1368, December.
    4. Qing Hu & Aika Monden & Tomomichi Mizuno, 2022. "Downstream Cross‐Holdings and Upstream R&D," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 775-789, September.
    5. Arghya Ghosh & Hodaka Morita, 2017. "Knowledge transfer and partial equity ownership," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 48(4), pages 1044-1067, December.
    6. Brito, Duarte & Cabral, Luís & Vasconcelos, Helder, 2014. "Divesting ownership in a rival," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 9-24.
    7. Joseph Farrell & Carl Shapiro, 1990. "Asset Ownership and Market Structure in Oligopoly," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 21(2), pages 275-292, Summer.
    8. Ángel L. López & Xavier Vives, 2019. "Overlapping Ownership, R&D Spillovers, and Antitrust Policy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(5), pages 2394-2437.
    9. Wilson A. Alley, 1997. "Partial Ownership Arrangements and Collusion in the Automobile Industry," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 191-205, June.
    10. David Gilo & Yossi Moshe & Yossi Spiegel, 2006. "Partial Cross Ownership and Tacit Collusion," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 37(1), pages 81-99, Spring.
    11. Li, Sanxi & Ma, Hongkun & Zeng, Chenhang, 2015. "Passive cross holding as a strategic entry deterrence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 37-40.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jie Shuai & Mengyuan Xia & Chenhang Zeng, 2023. "Upstream market structure and downstream partial ownership," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 22-47, January.
    2. Swapnendu Banerjee & Arijit Mukherjee & Sougata Poddar, 2025. "Product differentiation, demand expansion and the welfare effects of cross‐ownership," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 193-226, February.
    3. Hongkun Ma & Chenhang Zeng, 2022. "The effects of optimal cross holding in an asymmetric oligopoly," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(4), pages 1053-1066, October.
    4. Jianxia Yang & Chenhang Zeng, 2021. "Collusive stability of cross-holding with cost asymmetry," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 549-566, November.
    5. Arijit Mukherjee, 2023. "Losses from cross-holdings in a duopoly with convex cost and strategic input price determination," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 11(1), pages 81-91, April.
    6. Qing Hu & Aika Monden & Tomomichi Mizuno, 2022. "Downstream Cross‐Holdings and Upstream R&D," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 70(3), pages 775-789, September.
    7. Rupayan Pal & Emmanuel Petrakis, 2025. "Cross-ownership in duopoly: Are there any incentives to divest?," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 80(3), pages 703-744, November.
    8. Hariskos, W. & Königstein, M. & Papadopoulos, K.G., 2022. "Anti-competitive effects of partial cross-ownership: Experimental evidence," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 399-409.
    9. Domenico Buccella & Luciano Fanti & Luca Gori, 2025. "Cross-ownership in network industries: when less competition implies less profits or more social welfare," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 144(3), pages 203-230, April.
    10. Cao, Zhigang & Li, Guopeng & Shen, Sixian & Zhu, Feng, 2025. "Potentials in quadratic Cournot cross-holding games," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    11. Dong, Quan & Chang, Yang-Ming, 2020. "Emission taxes vs. environmental standards under partial ownership arrangements," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 250-262.
    12. Hao Cheng & Xiaoting Wu & Chenhang Zeng, 2024. "Can cross-holdings benefit consumers?," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 245-273, April.
    13. Li, Sanxi & Ma, Hongkun & Zeng, Chenhang, 2015. "Passive cross holding as a strategic entry deterrence," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 37-40.
    14. Yan Yan & Yi Li, 2026. "Partial Passive Ownership Holdings and Divisionalization," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 68(1), pages 55-69, January.
    15. Can Gökhan & Mukherjee Arijit, 2025. "Cross Ownership Under Strategic Tax Policy," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 25(1), pages 115-125.
    16. Yi Li, 2025. "Endogenous equity shares in duopoly markets with product differentiation," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(1), pages 227-246, February.
    17. Bárcena-Ruiz, Juan Carlos & Campo, María Luz, 2017. "Taxes versus standards under cross-ownership," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 36-50.
    18. Bayona, Anna & López, Ángel L. & Manganelli, Anton-Giulio, 2022. "Common ownership, corporate control and price competition," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1066-1075.
    19. Dai, Miao & Benchekroun, Hassan & Long, Ngo Van, 2022. "On the profitability of cross-ownership in Cournot nonrenewable resource oligopolies: Stock size matters," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    20. Sven Heim & Kai Hhschelrath & Ulrich Laitenberger & Yossi Spiegel, 2017. "Minority Share Acquisitions and Collusion: Evidence from the Introduction of National Leniency Programs," Working Papers hal-01952937, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • L13 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Oligopoly and Other Imperfect Markets
    • D43 - Microeconomics - - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design - - - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:koe:wpaper:2611. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kimiaki Shirahama The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Kimiaki Shirahama to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fekobjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.