IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/keo/dpaper/2020-011.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ecological feature benefiting sustainable harvesters in socio-ecological systems: A case study of swiftlets in Malaysia

Author

Listed:
  • Mayuko Nakamaru

    (School of Environment and Society, Tokyo Institute of Technology)

  • Ayumi Onuma

    (Faculty of Economics, Keio University)

Abstract

A major challenge in biodiversity management is overharvesting by unsustainable harvesters. If a scenario could be created where sustainable harvesters benefit more than the unsustainable ones, even in the short term, the issue of overharvesting would be solved. Then, everyone would follow the lead of sustainable harvesters. However, creating such a scenario is not an easy task; the difficulty is intensified if the habitat is open-access and a property rights system is not in place. There is a special case where sustainable harvesters are believed to gain more than unsustainable harvesters: swiftlets in Sarawak, Malaysia. Edible nests built by adult swiftlets are used as ingredients for a traditional luxurious soup in Chinese cuisine. A rise in nest prices has increased the instances of unsustainable harvesters wrongfully collecting nests along with the eggs and fledglings, which are then abandoned. Swiftlets live in caves and build nests on cave ceilings. It is known that swiftlets escape from cave ceilings when these harvesters take the nests, and they do not return to the same place. This ecological feature appears to work as the swiftlet's punishment against unsustainable harvesters. This paper constructs a stage-structured population model and examines the effect of property rights and the punishment by swiftlets on the population dynamics of the bird and on the economic return of both sustainable and unsustainable harvesters. Our findings are as follows: the punishment by swiftlets provides sustainable harvesters a higher short-term return than unsustainable harvesters under the property rights system, as long as swiftlets return to the cave after they escape from the unsustainable harvesters. While previous studies regarding the management of a commons have stressed the importance of rules and regulations for sustainable harvesting without considering the ecological uniqueness of each species, this study suggests that ecological exploration, and the discovery of ecological features are also essential for designing a sustainable framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Mayuko Nakamaru & Ayumi Onuma, 2020. "Ecological feature benefiting sustainable harvesters in socio-ecological systems: A case study of swiftlets in Malaysia," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2020-011, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
  • Handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2020-011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ies.keio.ac.jp/upload/pdf/en/DP2020-011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    the tragedy of the commons; property rights; indirect punishment by swiftlets; difference equations;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q57 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2020-011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.