IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/keo/dpaper/2018-002.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nonparametric Inference in Functional Linear Quantile Regression by RKHS Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Kosaku Takanashi

    (Faculty of Economics, Keio University)

Abstract

This paper studies an asymptotics of functional linear quantile regression in which the dependent variable is scalar while the covariate is a function. We apply a roughness regularization approach of a reproducing kernel Hilbert space framework. In the above circumstance, narrow convergence with respect to uniform convergence fails to hold, because of the strength of its topology. A new approach we propose to the lack-ofuniform- convergence is based on Mosco-convergence that is weaker topology than uniform convergence. By applying narrow convergence with respect to Mosco topology, we develop an infinite-dimensional version of the convexity argument and provide a proof of an asymptotic normality of argmin processes. Our new technique also provides the asymptotic confidence intervals and the generalized likelihood ratio hypothesis testing in fully nonparametric circumstance.

Suggested Citation

  • Kosaku Takanashi, 2018. "Nonparametric Inference in Functional Linear Quantile Regression by RKHS Approach," Keio-IES Discussion Paper Series 2018-002, Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University.
  • Handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2018-002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ies.keio.ac.jp/upload/pdf/en/DP2018-002.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Functional Linear Quantile Regression; Mosco topology; Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test; Estimation with Convex Constraint;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:keo:dpaper:2018-002. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Institute for Economics Studies, Keio University (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.