IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/kei/dpaper/2008-007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corruption in Japanese Defense Procurement: A Game-theoretic Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Tetsuro Mizoguchi

    (Institute of Economic Research, Kyoto University)

  • Nguyen Van Quyen

    (Department of Economics, University of Ottawa)

Abstract

The Japanese defense market is an oligopoly. Firms in the defense industry also produce civilian goods, and the revenues they obtain from defense contracts are quite small relative to the revenues coming from the production of private goods. Because the Japanese constitution prohibits arms export, the defense industry in Japan essentially serves an internal market. Furthermore, defense contracts are not awarded on a competitive basis. The procurement procedures rely on cost-plus contracts, most of which are carried out at the discretion of the bureaucrats in charge. Information on prices and contracts thus become extremely opaque, which makes it easier for misuse and corruption to flourish. The paper presents a game that incorporates these features of the defense procurement process. The results of the analysis suggest that the government pay for low-quality defenses goods at inflated prices. Furthermore, because Japanese firms are shielded from competition and because of the lack of a large foreign market, the Japanese defense industry has no incentive to engage in R&D to improve the quality of its defense goods.

Suggested Citation

  • Tetsuro Mizoguchi & Nguyen Van Quyen, 2008. "Corruption in Japanese Defense Procurement: A Game-theoretic Analysis," Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Discussion Paper Series 2008-007, Keio/Kyoto Joint Global COE Program.
  • Handle: RePEc:kei:dpaper:2008-007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ies.keio.ac.jp/old_project/old/gcoe-econbus/pdf/dp/DP2008-007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kei:dpaper:2008-007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Global COE Program Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iekeijp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.