The role of network boundary information in intellectual capital measure
In this paper, we will explore the role of network information in intellectual capital measures, focusing specifically on data from lender-borrower relationships. Our analysis found as follows: First, Japanese lenders who judge the creditworthiness of firms, place a great deal of importance on network boundary information in comparison to human resources and technology. Second, while Japanese lenders confront difficulties in accessing and evaluating a firms' human resources and technology, they comprehend that both resources are essential performance generators for firms. Third, lender perceptions show that both human resources and technologies are highly correlated to the larger network information. How do we interpret these local practices to help explain the surrounding societal context? This paper provides three possible interpretations as follows: First, Western philosophical and scientific perspective leads us to postulate that lenders are efficient, rational decision makers. Second, the New Institutionalism concludes that lenders make decisions in accordance with social norm determinants, rather than for personal optimization. Third, a pragmatic interpretation of the phenomenal use of network information from the more traditional philosophical awareness and rejection of the perfect measurement idea can be as follows: Lenders make decisions based on their daily practice and reflection on firms' human resources and technology within the socially shared context.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Web page: http://www.b.kobe-u.ac.jp/repec/kbb/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kbb:dpaper:2011-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Yasuyuki Miyahara)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.