IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iwt/conppr/h031914.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Comparing soil nutrient depletion in typical urban, peri-urban and rural farming systems in Ghana

Author

Listed:
  • Drechsel, P.

Abstract

In a response to rapid urban growth in Africa, specialized urban and peri-urban vegetable production systems emerge and contribute significantly to urban food security. these production systems are dominated by smallholders and can achieve despite poor soils astonishing high profits. This, however, require intensive fertilization (e.g. 100-200 tiha poultry manure) and year-round irrigation of 600-1600 mm, which adds further nutrients but also contributes to nutrient leaching. In this highly dynamic input-output system fanners are demonstrating that \permanent\ cropping is possible on poor tropical soils but for the price of high N and K losses and water eutrophication. The situation is described for the case of lettuce, cabbage and spring onion farming in and around Kumasi, Ghana. Nutrient balances and depletion costs have also been calculated for the more conventional (rural) maize-cassava intercrop for comparison as well as rainfed tomato farming. From fanners point of view, the \costs\ of nutrient mining vary with the availability of farm land. In the conventional system, fanner still can to shift when soil fertility is low, thus pay only for the preparation of a new field. In the land constrained urban vegetable system the costs of nutrient mining can best be assessed through their replacement costs via poultry manure or mineral fertilizer. Additional off-site costs of the vegetable system might be balanced through the fertilizer value of the water (for irrigation) and appears in general marginal in comparison with water pollution through the urban run-off.

Suggested Citation

  • Drechsel, P., 2002. "Comparing soil nutrient depletion in typical urban, peri-urban and rural farming systems in Ghana," Conference Papers h031914, International Water Management Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:iwt:conppr:h031914
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.iwmi.org/pdf/H031914.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Irrigated farming;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iwt:conppr:h031914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chandima Gunadasa (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iwmiclk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.