IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Considerations on advantages and drawbacks of an infrastructure-oriented development strategy


  • Tamas Fleischer

    (Institute of World Economics, Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences)


The starting point of our paper dealing with advantages and drawbacks of infrastructure- oriented development strategy is that one should not base economic policy on the assumption that the best hoped political strategy will undoubtedly prevail. From among the five possible scenarios evaluated with the three positive ones similar infrastructural networks are attached: all of them can be characterised that they try to ease the centralisation of the networks and promote internal, regional development with a kind of restructuration. In the same time just the scenarios to be avoided would be promoted by reinforcing the existing, hierarchic, centralised infrastructure network structures. In such a situation the paper express a definite standpoint: it is not enough to be for infrastructure orientation in general, since while constructing networks contributing to restructuration have an urgent need, the development of other and opposite kind of structure-preserving networks would be explicitely harmful. Our differentiation gained from political scenarios is in line with the experience to be gained from the analysis of the state and development tendencies of existing large European structures - gas, transport and electricity networks. Distributive networks able to secure sufficient local privison are a sufficient basis for the crosspoint effects of larger, magistral networks to have positive impact on the area. On the other hand in underdeveloped, ill-provided regions magistral networks easily can produce enclave-like, Third World type effect raising rather torsion in than promoting development and thereby rather coserving instead of liquidating backwardness. Only a cautiously and selectively initiated infrastructure oriented economic policy taking all the above mentioned facts into account might serve as a development alternative for the country.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamas Fleischer, 1994. "Considerations on advantages and drawbacks of an infrastructure-oriented development strategy," IWE Working Papers 39, Institute for World Economics - Centre for Economic and Regional Studies- Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
  • Handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:39

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iwe:workpr:39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kanász Mária (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.