IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iuj/wpaper/ems_2026_05.html

Abstract vs. Concrete Messages: Reassessing the Impact of Construal Level on Prosocial Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Sheehan

    (IUJ Research Institute, International University of Japan)

  • Pramodhya Dissanayake

Abstract

Construal level theory suggests that abstract versus concrete messages can influence prosocial behavior. However, results from the empirical literature remain inconclusive. This paper examines the effect of seven different sets of concrete vs. abstract messages upon prosocial behavior. This was done while holding the message context, sample characteristics, and measurement constant. The results suggest the impacts of message abstraction on attitudes, behavioral intent, and message involvement are small and vary in direction. Three of the seven studies show statistically significant differences, but an optimal framing approach does not emerge. A pooled analysis suggests no overall effect. These findings suggest that construal level effects in prosocial contexts may be sensitive to the specific way in which abstraction is operationalized.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Sheehan & Pramodhya Dissanayake, 2026. "Abstract vs. Concrete Messages: Reassessing the Impact of Construal Level on Prosocial Behavior," Working Papers EMS_2026_05, Research Institute, International University of Japan.
    • Handle: RePEc:iuj:wpaper:ems_2026_05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www2.iuj.ac.jp/workingpapers/index.cfm?File=EMS_2026_05.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2026
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iuj:wpaper:ems_2026_05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Toshiyuki Moriyama, Office of Academic Affairs (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsiujjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.