IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iuc/rpaper/1-09.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

IUC Independent Policy Report: At the End of the End of History - Global Legal Standards: Part of the Solution or Part of the Problem?

Author

Listed:
  • Ugo Mattei

    (UC Hastings, University of Turin & IUC Turin)

  • Edoardo Reviglio

    (International University College of Turin)

  • Guido Calabresi

    (Yale Law School)

  • Antoine Garapon

    (Institut des Hautes Etudes sur la Justice, Paris)

  • Tibor Varady

    (Central European University, Budapest)

  • Franco Bassanini

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

  • Giuseppe Mastruzzo

    (International University College of Turin)

  • Eugenio Barcellona

    (Eastern Piedmont University, Italy)

  • Mauro Bussani

    (University of Trieste)

  • Giuliano Castellano

    (Ecole Polytechnique (Preg/CRG), Paris)

  • Moussa Djire'

    (Bamako University)

  • Liu Guanghua

    (Lanzhou University)

  • Golnoosh Hakimdavar

    (University of Turin, CLEI Centre)

  • Joseph Halevi

    (Sidney University)

  • John D. Haskell

    (SOAS)

  • Andrea Lolli

    (University of Bologna)

  • Alberto Lucarelli

    (Federico II University, Naples)

  • Boris Mamlyuk

    (University of Turin, CLEI Centre)

  • Alberto Monti

    (Bocconi University)

  • Sergio Ariel Muro

    (Torquato di Tella University)

  • Domenico Nicolo'

    (Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria, Italy)

  • Nicola Sartori

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor)

  • Jedidiah Kroncke

    (Yale Law School)

Abstract

The IUC Independent Policy Report was drafted by the IUC Legal Standards Research Group, organized by a Steering Committee chaired by Ugo Mattei (International University College of Turin), coordinated by Edoardo Reviglio (International University College of Turin) and Giuseppe Mastruzzo (International University College of Turin), and composed by Franco Bassanini (University of Rome 'La Sapienza'), Guido Calabresi (Yale University), Antoine Garapon (Institut des Hautes Etudes sur la Justice, Paris), and Tibor Varady (Central European University, Budapest). Contributors include Eugenio Barcellona (Eastern Piedmont University), Mauro Bussani (University of Trieste), Giuliano G. Castellano (Ecole Polytechnique Preg/CRG), Moussa Djire' (Bamako University), Liu Guanghua (Lanzhou University), Golnoosh Hakimdavar (University of Turin), John D. Haskell (SOAS), Jedidiah J. Kroncke (Yale Law School), Andrea Lollini (Bologna University), Alberto Lucarelli (Federico II University), Boris N. Mamlyuk, (University of Turin), Alberto Monti (Bocconi University), Sergio Ariel Muro (Torquato di Tella University), Domenico Nicolo' (Mediterranean University of Reggio Calabria), and Nicola Sartori (University of Michigan). The IUC Independent Policy Report argues for a radical change of perspective, capable of restoring the supremacy of the law over the economic system. It is not only about finance, nor is it only about economics or policy. In this sense a transnational set of normative principles is needed in order to establish a global legal system capable of controlling economic processes, rather than being controlled by them. Within this framework a series of policy proposals are presented in order to effectively implement a new system of global standards. The current Western standard of living is unsustainable. Should the rest share the model of development of the West, our planet will simply not be capable of resisting the growth in consumption and pollution. Within this fundamental setting of scarcity in resources, using the rhetoric of the end of history as the polar star for growth, development and ultimately happiness of the whole world is simply a cynical lie. We argue here for the beginning of a necessary process aimed at the development of a legal system that is much less about creating an efficient backbone for an exploitive economy and much more about a vision of civilization, justice and respect where the laws of nature and those of humans converge in a sustainable long-term philosophy. Principles of justice, responsibility and long term environmental protection, rather than short term economic contingency and strong interests must set the legal agenda. A new governance and bottom-up inclusive integration of knowledge-based economies (wherever located), which is crucial to the very survival of humankind, cannot happen without defning new terms of a widely accepted standard of long term justice in the transnational context, hence the urgency to conceive legitimate transnational legal structures and possibly some apparatus of 'superlegality'. The report is composed of five sections. After having presented the pitfalls of the prevailing theoretical apparatus, an alternative cultural grid upon which policy actions should be shaped is presented. In this sense several normative proposals - revisiting the key characteristics of the current system - are offered aiming at acquiring a wider perspective over the actual global crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Ugo Mattei & Edoardo Reviglio & Guido Calabresi & Antoine Garapon & Tibor Varady & Franco Bassanini & Giuseppe Mastruzzo & Eugenio Barcellona & Mauro Bussani & Giuliano Castellano & Moussa Djire' & Li, 2009. "IUC Independent Policy Report: At the End of the End of History - Global Legal Standards: Part of the Solution or Part of the Problem?," IUC Research Commons 1-09, International University College of Turin.
  • Handle: RePEc:iuc:rpaper:1-09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ideas.iuctorino.it/RePEc/iuc-rpaper/1-09_IUC-Global-Legal-Standards.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2009
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    global legal standards; economic crisis; capitalism; global economic policy; legal theory; finance; financial regulation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • G28 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Government Policy and Regulation
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • P48 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Legal Institutions; Property Rights; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Regional Studies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iuc:rpaper:1-09. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Marchisio (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipiucit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.