IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/2007010108000015882.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade-off between cost of traceability within a small and large commercial meat plant and economic benefits of reducing the number of recalls and size of recalls

Author

Listed:
  • Lindley, Bryan

Abstract

Is the benefit of reducing the size or probability of a recall worth the cost of the system? Recalls have the potential to incur large cost associated with loss of product, negative publicity, and legal judgments. A model including the cost of traceability, probability that a recall occurs, costs associated with a recall, and severity of recall events is simulated using a random draw of probability and average size from a given distribution for both a 400 head per day and a 5,000 head per day beef plant. For a small plant, it was estimated that the reduction in size of recall by 77 percent is required to breakeven while a greater than 99 percent reduction in probability is required. For a large plant, the breakeven point plant is found at a 7 percent reduction in size of a recall and 15 percent reduction in the probability of a recall.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindley, Bryan, 2007. "Trade-off between cost of traceability within a small and large commercial meat plant and economic benefits of reducing the number of recalls and size of recalls," ISU General Staff Papers 2007010108000015882, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:2007010108000015882
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/3086857f-bd5f-4cf1-90c5-04c24e89a3be/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. James B. Dai & Lei Fan & Neville K.S. Lee & Jianbin Li, 2017. "Joint optimisation of tracking capability and price in a supply chain with endogenous pricing," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(18), pages 5465-5484, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:2007010108000015882. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.