IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/198301010800008688.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The role of inter vivos financing in the intergenerational transfer of the corporate farm under uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Reinders, David Lee

Abstract

During the 1970s, the combination of rapidly appreciating land values with the trend toward fewer but larger farms dramatically increased the need for tax management and tax planning. Income and estate tax considerations pose problems for many farm families that want the next generation to continue the farm business. Accordingly, there is an increasing interest in starting the intergenerational transfer process during the parents' lifetimes. Selected equity and nonequity intrafamily financing may or may not facilitate intergenerational transfers. Financing arrangements can create interpersonal conflicts between the objectives of the parents and those of the on-farm heir. This study investigates selected financing arrangements and identifies those which facilitate the intergenerational transfer and those which do not;The Iowa State University Business and Financial Planning Model was used to investigate the financial consequences that selected equity and nonequity financing arrangements have on the parents and the heir. The model incorporated uncertainty as to future events through a Monte Carlo simulation technique which randomly generated nonzero error terms about the expected values of farm revenues and expenses. By recursively running the model a cumulative density function was constructed. First, second, and third degree stochastic dominance theorems were used to compare the cumulative density functions to determine which one (if any) maximized the expected utilities of the parents and the heir;When the farm firm is incorporated as a regularly taxed corporation, all parents and on-farm heirs unanimously prefer corporate income through salaries and director's fees over common stock dividends. If both the parents and the heir are risk averters, both can benefit when the heir converts part of his (her) equity interest in the firm to an investor interest in the form of a loan. Creation of an intrafamily loan to the heir increases the expected utilities both of the parents and the on-farm heir. While intrafamily loans to the heir facilitate intergenerational transfers, the same is not true when the heir converts part of his (her) equity into a bond. The parents increase their expected utilities at the expense of the heir's. An intrafamily bond issued to the heir will never be used to facilitate intergenerational transfers because it is counterproductive and does not facilitate the intergenerational transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Reinders, David Lee, 1983. "The role of inter vivos financing in the intergenerational transfer of the corporate farm under uncertainty," ISU General Staff Papers 198301010800008688, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198301010800008688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/04a3618b-1430-45f2-a3d8-e3819b4b1b16/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barkema, Alan Dean, 1985. "Farm survival under uncertainty," ISU General Staff Papers 1985010108000017535, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Johnson, James William, 1985. "Land prices: changes and variability: the effect on Iowa grain farms," ISU General Staff Papers 1985010108000017533, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    3. Lowenberg-DeBoer, James & Boehlje, Michael, 1987. "The Distributional Impact Of 1981 And 1982 Federal Income Tax Legislation: Which Farmers Benefit?," Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198301010800008688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.