IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/isu/genstf/198001010800007712.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Commodity options as an alternative to hedging live cattle

Author

Listed:
  • Catlett, Lowell B.

Abstract

Commodity options are currently illegal in the United States but the Commodity Futures Trading Commission is trying to initiate a pilot trading program. The success of a trial trading period depends very heavily on the type of option market established, trading rules and regulations, and how well options perform as a hedging mechanism. This study addresses the details of buying and granting calls, puts, and doubles while discussing the major problem areas facing the commodity option market. A simulation model is developed to create a synthetic options market for live cattle futures to test if options can be an alternative to traditional hedging;The economic viability of options as hedges is the crucial problem facing the development of an option market. Research results from simulated synthetic options market show that, under certain mechanical filters, option hedges are superior and at least as good as futures hedges in terms of gross mean returns and variance. Double options appear to be inferior to futures hedges when premium values approach 20 percent or more of the striking price;Specific policy recommendations are made based on the simulation results regarding whether a pilot program is feasible and the particular make-up of the trading program.

Suggested Citation

  • Catlett, Lowell B., 1980. "Commodity options as an alternative to hedging live cattle," ISU General Staff Papers 198001010800007712, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198001010800007712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dr.lib.iastate.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/22dfb7cb-7c90-4a1d-8032-14180400deda/content
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genstf:198001010800007712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Curtis Balmer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.