The Economic Value of Minimum-Variance Hedges
The present article examines the potential economic gains from "better" minimum-variance hedge (MVH) estimates, focusing on the assumptions that yield MVHs consistent with expected-utility maximization. It is found that the economic value of "better" MVH estimates is negligible, and that optimal hedges are substantially different from MVHs when the usual MVH restrictions are relaxed. Among other things, findings suggest that the hedging research's recent emphasis on "better" MVHs has been a waste of resources. Investigating the consequences of relaxing the standard MVH assumptions seems to be much more important than recent literature contributions.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||01 May 1995|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published in American Journal of Agricultural Economics, May 1995, vol. 77 no. 2, pp. 353-364|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Iowa State University, Dept. of Economics, 260 Heady Hall, Ames, IA 50011-1070|
Phone: +1 515.294.6741
Fax: +1 515.294.0221
Web page: http://www.econ.iastate.edu
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isu:genres:5053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Curtis Balmer)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.