IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/wpaper/20091.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Corporate R&D: A policy target looking for instruments

Author

Listed:

Abstract

R&D intensity indicators are increasingly used not only for international comparisons, but also as targets for policies stimulating research. The two are of course intimately linked: it makes little sense to set a quantitative policy target when not knowing whether it is high or low compared to economies at similar stages of development. This paper reflects upon the (Barcelona) target to lift R&D spending to 3% of GDP, set by the EU as a key part of its (Lisbon) strategy for growth and jobs. The paper provides empirical evidence showing the target of 3% of GDP for R&D expenditures in the EU as a whole to be overly ambitious, even though some Member States are above. It also argues that the EU's strategy is short on policy instruments to reach this target. In fact, what appears a simple target actually sums up public R&D, over which decision makers have direct control, and private R&D, which may be partly publicly funded but which can be influenced only indirectly. In this respect, it is clear that national policy-makers have to take into account that the bulk of R&D is conducted by relatively few companies that mostly operate on a global scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Pietro Moncada-Paternò-Castello & Keith Smith, 2009. "Corporate R&D: A policy target looking for instruments," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2009-1, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:wpaper:20091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iri.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/contentype//publication//workingpaper//1568811008//Corporate%20R%26D%20-%20A%20policy%20target%20looking%20for%20instruments.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Research and Development; policy targets; international comparison; economic and policy analysis of industrial research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:wpaper:20091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.