IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/laedte/202507.html

Surveying the Twin Transition at the workplace: From concepts to measures

Author

Listed:

Abstract

The Twin Transition is a cornerstone of EU policy, driving structural changes in European labour markets. However, a critical gap exists between policy and empirical evidence due to the lack of measurement instruments. This study addresses this gap by developing and testing the Twin Transition Survey, designed to measure synergies between digitalisation and sustainability at the workplace. Our results, based on experts' review, cognitive testing and a pilot survey, yield clear insights. First, the aim of capturing synergies should not be conflated with operational measurement. Workers are likely to perceive the green and digital transitions as two distinct phenomena because of their differential tangible impacts. Therefore, survey instruments should treat them as operationally separate to reduce cognitive burden and improve response validity. Second, some indicators used in the literature, e.g., those targeting company-level practices or perceived environmental impacts, can increase nonresponse rates and are prone to acquiescence bias, especially among frontline workers, potentially leading to overestimation. Data reliability is higher when based on factual, individual-level indicators grounded in workers’ direct experience with their daily tasks. These should be complemented with more generalizable measures of “soft greening”, whose reliability can be checked by segmenting responses by supervisory role. Finally, the study presents the questionnaire of the survey as a validated tool to measure the impact of the Twin Transition at the workplace.

Suggested Citation

  • Martínez-sánchez Wilfrid & Mariscal De Gante Martin Alvaro & Fernandez Macias Enrique & Gonzalez Vazquez Ignacio & Moilanen Fanni, 2025. "Surveying the Twin Transition at the workplace: From concepts to measures," JRC Working Papers on Labour, Education and Technology 2025-07, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:laedte:202507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC143999
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Timo Lenzner & Patricia Hadler & Cornelia Neuert, 2023. "An experimental test of the effectiveness of cognitive interviewing in pretesting questionnaires," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3199-3217, August.
    2. Dennis Wilke & Henriette Rau & Joachim W. Härtling, 2022. "Case Study: Assessing The COVID-19 Pandemic’s Potential for a More Climate-Friendly Work-Related Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard G. Cowden & Deborah Skinstad & Tim Lomas & Byron R. Johnson & Tyler J. VanderWeele, 2025. "Measuring wellbeing in the Global Flourishing Study: insights from a cross-national analysis of cognitive interviews from 22 countries," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 575-597, February.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:laedte:202507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.