IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Methods to measure impact of eInclusion Actors. Exploratory Study on Methods used to measure the ICT-mediated Social Impact of grassroots organisations




This report summarises the results of the research project ‘Exploratory Study on Methods used to measure the ICT-mediated Social Impact of grassroots organisations’. This study was commissioned by IPTS to feed into a forthcoming 2-year research project: Measuring the impact of eInclusion actors on Digital Literacy, Skills and Inclusion goals (MIREIA). The report maps and reviews evaluation and impact assessment methods that have been developed and used to understand the social and economic impact of eInclusion actors, with a focus on quantitative approaches and production of measures that relate to policy goals. The first step was the compilation and preliminary profiling of a list of 81 examples of impact assessment approaches, identified through a literature and practice review. Following a process of evaluation, eleven approaches were documented and analysed in more depth. After that, the three ‘most relevant’ approaches were then selected for further analysis with particular reference to their feasibility as inputs to developing the MIREIA framework, and with reference to illustrative case studies of their use by grass roots organisations. Finally this report includes additional case study analysis of examples of the use of impacts assessment methods in real-world ‘grass roots’ interventions based on the results of the validation workshop. The overall conclusion of the study is that the main purpose of the MIRIEA framework and indicators should be to support impacts assessment as a ‘process’ – the process of creating the conditions to enable the embedding and implementation of concepts, methods, tools and practices, and their subsequent adaptation and evolution through use. In other words, the main purpose of the framework and tools is to support ‘praxis’.

Suggested Citation

  • Joe Cullen & Alexandra Haché & Damian Hayward & Veronique Maes, 2013. "Methods to measure impact of eInclusion Actors. Exploratory Study on Methods used to measure the ICT-mediated Social Impact of grassroots organisations," JRC Working Papers JRC73654, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc73654

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Pierre Dupraz & Karine Latouche & Nadine Turpin, 2009. "Threshold effect and co-ordination of agri-environmental efforts," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(5), pages 613-630.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item


    impact assessment; evaluation methods; eInclusion; grassroots organisations; social impact; economic impact; impact; eInclusion actors;

    JEL classification:

    • I32 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty - - - Measurement and Analysis of Poverty


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc73654. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Publication Officer). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.