IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc143072.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digital Monitoring, Algorithmic Management and the Platformisation of Work in Europe

Author

Listed:

Abstract

This report presents new evidence on the platformisation of work in the European Union, examining the prevalence and potential impacts of digital tools, digital monitoring and algorithmic management. The report is based on data from the new AIM-WORK survey, conducted in 2024-2025 and representative of the working age population in all 27 EU Member States. The data reveals that over 90% of EU workers use digital devices, with the use of AI tools at work, particularly AI chatbots powered by Large Language Models, rising rapidly: on average, a third of EU workers report using AI for work-related purposes. Digital monitoring is common, particularly for working hours and entry or exit. Algorithmic management is less prevalent but also quite significant, taking diverse forms, including automated task allocation and performance evaluation. We identify two distinct types of platformisation, typical respectively of industrial and office workplaces. Our evidence indicates that some types of platformisation have no significant implications for working conditions. However, the full platformisation of work, which includes simultaneously all the forms of digital monitoring and algorithmic management that we identify on the basis of the data, is associated with generally worse working conditions. This applies also to the forms of platformisation more prevalent in manual work settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Gonzalez Vazquez Ignacio & Fernandez Macias Enrique & Wright Sally & Villani Davide, 2025. "Digital Monitoring, Algorithmic Management and the Platformisation of Work in Europe," JRC Research Reports JRC143072, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143072
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC143072
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc143072. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.