IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc129321.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measuring Universality in Social Protection: a pilot study on unemployment benefits

Author

Listed:
  • ARRANZ-MUÑOZ José-María
  • GARCÍA-SERRANO Carlos
  • HERNANZ Virginia

Abstract

The purpose of this report is to analyse the degree of universality of unemployment benefits across EU Member States. This study builds upon the conceptual framework to define and measure the universality of social protection from Muñoz de Bustillo et al. (2020), and upon Arranz et al. (2021), who operationalize and test on a pilot basis the previous analytical framework for an EU Member State (Spain). In the case of UB, coverage should be measured using a percentage rate of unemployed covered by unemployment benefits, and adequacy using a replacement rate during the unemployment spell, i.e. the proportion of pre-unemployment income that is maintained after t months of unemployment. We rely on EU-level data from Eurostat and the OECD and propose an approach for measuring the adequacy and coverage of UB across the EU, discussing the pros and cons of different indicators. The best indicators are aggregated into a synthetic index of universality of unemployment benefits for each Member State. The report concludes with a set of considerations and recommendations arising from the measurement process carried out.

Suggested Citation

  • ARRANZ-MUÑOZ José-María & GARCÍA-SERRANO Carlos & HERNANZ Virginia, 2022. "Measuring Universality in Social Protection: a pilot study on unemployment benefits," JRC Research Reports JRC129321, Joint Research Centre.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc129321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC129321
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social protection; universality; coverage; adequacy; unemployment benefits; unemployment insurance;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipt:iptwpa:jrc129321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Publication Officer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipjrces.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.