Author
Listed:
- Sandro Pereira Silva
- Fernanda Abreu Nagem
Abstract
Este trabalho tem como foco de investigação a política pública de economia solidária no governo federal, que começou a ser implementada em 2003 com a criação da Secretaria Nacional de Economia Solidária (Senaes), inserida no Ministério do Trabalho e Emprego (MTE). O principal objetivo é analisar os mecanismos pelos quais a temática da economia solidária foi adotada como objeto de política pública e como ela foi conduzida em termos de estratégia de governo para a geração de trabalho e renda. Primeiramente, de acordo com o modelo de Kingdon (1995), pode-se distinguir claramente a interação entre os três fluxos - problemas, soluções e político - que propiciaram a inserção da economia solidária na agenda governamental em 2003. Todavia, os resultados apontam que a economia solidária foi encarada pelo governo federal como uma alternativa paliativa ao problema do desemprego, voltada apenas para grupos excluídos e de difícil inserção no mercado de trabalho assalariado. Por outro lado, deve-se ressaltar que, apesar de todas as dificuldades, a Senaes conseguiu aglutinar ao seu entorno forças sócio-políticas importantes para a defesa da economia solidária enquanto objeto de política pública. This work focuses on the public policy of solidary economy in the federal government, which began to be implemented in 2003 with the creation of the Senaes, inserted at the Ministry of Labor and Employment. The main objective is to analyze the mechanisms by which the theme of solidary economy was adopted as an object of public policy and how it was conducted in terms of government strategy to generate employment and income. First, according to the model of Kingdon (1995), one can clearly distinguish the interaction between the three streams that led to insertion of the solidary economy on the government agenda in 2003. However, the results indicate that the solidary economy by the federal government was seen as a palliative alternative to the unemi. ployment problem, focusing solely to excluded groups and difficult entry into the wage labor. On the other hand, it should be noted that, despite all the difficulties, the Senaes managed to coalesce around its major socio-political forces to defend the social solidary economy as an object of public policy.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1682. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabio Schiavinatto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipeaabr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.