IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Compras Governamentais para o Programa Nacional do Livro Didático: Uma Discussão Sobre a Eficiência do Governo


  • Ricardo Pereira Soares


The current National Schoolbook Program (PNLD) was started in 1985 by Decree 91.542, which brought substantial changes compared to earlier attempted programs, such as which established that the choice of the schoolbook would be made directly by the professor. The basic question this study tries to answer is: could the government, which buys 90% of the production of schoolbook in Brazil, be more cost effective in the execution of PNLD? This study shows that the government brought books from 110 publishers during the period 1998-2006, spending R$ 4.5 billion, but, due to the oligopoly in the book market, only 6 publishers houses, Abril, Santillana, FTD, Saraiva, IBEP, Ediouro e Editora Brasil received R$ 3.893,3 million, corresponding to 87% of total expenditures in schoolbook. The study indicates that this concentration of expenditures in few firms is due to the high expenses of the publishers advertising, influencing the teachers? choices. The study concludes that the government utilizes only partially its procurement power in the accomplishment of the PNLD, since it demands pedagogic quality of the schoolbooks, but did not purchase in the regions where they will be used. If the government did so it would permit the reduction of the distribution and transportation costs and conversely encouraging more competition between publishers and, thus, reducing the books prices. In conclusion, this study infers that the government could be more efficient in the execution of the PNLD if it changes the current procurement rules, establishing new conditions in the acquisitions of didactic books. With this perspective, the government should use in its own benefit the Author?s Copyright Law or adopt new concepts of choosing the schoolbook by the professors, and increasing competition among publishers.

Suggested Citation

  • Ricardo Pereira Soares, 2007. "Compras Governamentais para o Programa Nacional do Livro Didático: Uma Discussão Sobre a Eficiência do Governo," Discussion Papers 1307, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1307

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Kwiatkowski, Denis & Phillips, Peter C. B. & Schmidt, Peter & Shin, Yongcheol, 1992. "Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root : How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 54(1-3), pages 159-178.
    2. Franses, Philip Hans & Haldrup, Niels, 1994. "The Effects of Additive Outliers on Tests for Unit Roots and Cointegration," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 12(4), pages 471-478, October.
    3. Haldrup, Niels, "undated". "Empirical analysis of price data in the delineation of the relevant geographical market in competition analysis," Economics Working Papers 2003-9, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    4. Cheung, Yin-Wong & Chinn, Menzie D, 1997. "Further Investigation of the Uncertain Unit Root in GNP," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 15(1), pages 68-73, January.
    5. Cati, Regina Celia & Garcia, Marcio G P & Perron, Pierre, 1999. "Unit Roots in the Presence of Abrupt Governmental Interventions with an Application to Brazilian Data," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(1), pages 27-56, Jan.-Feb..
    6. Engle, Robert & Granger, Clive, 2015. "Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing," Applied Econometrics, Publishing House "SINERGIA PRESS", vol. 39(3), pages 106-135.
    7. Mario Forni, 2004. "Using Stationarity Tests in Antitrust Market Definition," American Law and Economics Review, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 441-464.
    8. Dickey, David A & Pantula, Sastry G, 1987. "Determining the Ordering of Differencing in Autoregressive Processes," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 5(4), pages 455-461, October.
    9. Sims, Christopher A, 1972. "Money, Income, and Causality," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 62(4), pages 540-552, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fabio Schiavinatto). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.