IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Construção de Indicadores Coincidentes para a Atividade Industrial Brasileira e Comparação de Metodologias


  • Gilberto Hollauer
  • João Victor Issler


In this paper we perform and evaluate, in sample, some methodologies for building of coincident indicators focusing on the detection of business cycle of the Industrial activity. In respect of selection of coincident series for the Brazilian case, we will lean on recent literature (SPACOV, 2001). Specifically, we try a version of coincident indicator based on the coincident indicator for economy of the TCB (The Conference Board), a modified version in which the volatility is modeled and a Stock-Watson approach. Finally, we test if the unemployment series can be a good indicator for recession, as in American case, when submitted to a Hamilton Modeling. We conclude that, in general, the TCB index outperform the others methods tested, being competitive just with the modified method. Furthermore, The TCB Traditional has the tendency to comprehend the recessives periods of the others, in correspondence with the known recessive periods for industrial activity. The Stock-Watson approach and the Hamilton modeling are not appropriate for Brazilian Industrial Economy. The former because ignore almost all recessive periods known and the second, on the contrary, since indicates a excessive ones. In addition, we have concluded that when we compare with preceding research, dating made by Duarte, Issler e Spacov for instance, the standard TCB method is superior and most appropriated.

Suggested Citation

  • Gilberto Hollauer & João Victor Issler, 2006. "Construção de Indicadores Coincidentes para a Atividade Industrial Brasileira e Comparação de Metodologias," Discussion Papers 1194, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1194

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Fabio Schiavinatto). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.