IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipe/ipetds/1078.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Uma Análise da Composição da Renda da População Urbana Segundo Diferentes Fontes com ênfase na Renda Previdenciária no Período 1992-2002

Author

Listed:
  • Kaizô Iwakami Beltrão
  • Sonoe Sugahara
  • Flávio Rabelo

Abstract

The social security policies can be described as a set of actions that aim to cover theeventual loss of the working capacity. In general, the public systems intend to cover abasic portion of the income, without the intention of keeping the total purchasingpower. It is usually left to the complementary funds to fulfill this function. In Brazil, thehistory of the complementary funds is relatively recent: the law that regulated these fundsfor the first time (Law 6.435) was approved in 1977. In the past, individuals with higherincome used alternative strategies for the maintenance of their purchasing power.Familiar investments in property and businesses were the most common options, sincethe stock market was very incipient. More recently it is already possible to notice theweight of the private pension funds (open and closed) in the income of the agedBrazilians. This work has as objective the analysis of the urban population disaggregatedby sex, groups of age and schooling of the head of the domicile, in the period 1992-2002according to the different sources of income. Another objective is to calculate the relativeweight of each one of these income sources in the individual budget, as well as itsevolution in the last decade and along the life cycle. Special emphasis is placed on theincome received from social security: when the most aged population is focused, theanalysis of the different strategies used (or not) by the individuals to equalize the incomealong the life cycle points to the fact that between the alternatives, the most efficient onesseem to be the accumulation with the work and or the existence of a complementaryfund. The used data are from different PNADs along the time period 1992-2002.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaizô Iwakami Beltrão & Sonoe Sugahara & Flávio Rabelo, 2005. "Uma Análise da Composição da Renda da População Urbana Segundo Diferentes Fontes com ênfase na Renda Previdenciária no Período 1992-2002," Discussion Papers 1078, Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada - IPEA.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/td_1078.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipe:ipetds:1078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabio Schiavinatto (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipeaabr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.