IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipc/pbrief/43.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Lara de Arruda

    () (IPC-IG)

  • Ashleigh Kate Slingsby

    () (IPC-IG)

Abstract

The BRICS Grouping (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) and the IBSA Dialogue Forum (India, Brazil and South Africa)represent interregional cooperative mechanisms of increasing importance in international relations. This can be attributed to the recent rise of the global South, placing unprecedented emphasis on South?South cooperation. With three members in common, the necessity for and contribution of both IBSA and BRICS are often called into question. IBSA?s two-year successive postponement of its annual summit, five of which have taken place thus far, has prompted questions regarding the continued relevance of an organisation which in many ways is viewed as duplicating the functions of BRICS. Combined with the fact that BRICS contains the political-economic weight of Russia and China (permanent members of the United Nations Security Council and Nuclear Superpowers), the future of IBSA is doubted by some. To determine the future of IBSA, it is important to examine how it differs from BRICS in terms of capacity, priorities and political character. (?) http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCPolicyResearchBrief43.pdf

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Lara de Arruda & Ashleigh Kate Slingsby, 2014. "Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS," Policy Research Brief 43, International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
  • Handle: RePEc:ipc:pbrief:43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ipc-undp.org/pub/IPCPolicyResearchBrief43.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2014
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Digesting the Alphabet Soup: a Comparative Institutional History of IBSA and BRICS;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipc:pbrief:43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andre Lyra). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ipcunbr.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.