Reservation and Anti-Casteist Practices as Instruments of Social Protection in India?
An important debate brought about by De Haan (2013) concerns how the very concept of the nation in India and China depends upon providing equitable instruments for the economic inclusion of segments of the population trapped in backward positions. Whereas in China social exclusion is more related to ethnic minorities (non-Han people), in India it is embedded in the historically-produced identity-poverty-trap of casteism, such exclusion affects a majority of the country?s population. The latter is based upon cognitive practices consolidated in all levels of social interaction: from a macro-institutional level to meso-level of unruly practices. (?)
|Date of creation:||Jun 2013|
|Date of revision:|
|Publication status:||Published by UNDP - International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth , June 2013, pages 1-1|
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.ipc-undp.org|
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ipc:opager:203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Andre Lyra)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.