Author
Listed:
- Rene Schwaiger
- Julian Benda
- Esther Blanco
- Armando Holzknecht
- Jürgen Huber
- Michael Kirchler
Abstract
Carbon dividends have been proposed as a mechanism to build public support for carbon pricing, yet evidence from real-world policy settings with highly visible dividend designs remains absent. We study the Austrian Klimabonus, a carbon dividend with highly visible features paying every adult resident an annual lump-sum transfer of €145 – €290. This manuscript presents results from two large and preregistered studies ($N$= 2,628) with representative samples of the Austrian population, investigating support for carbon pricing before and after the Klimabonus’ abolition in 2025, including two real-life measures of support. Despite three years of branded, direct payments, Study 1 showed that the baseline awareness of carbon tax revenues being returned to citizens remained very low (14\%), and only 20–30\% of residents supported the carbon price while dividends were in place. Two information treatments explaining the tax and its efficiency or additionally linking the carbon tax to the dividend had limited effects on support. Study 2 revealed that one year after the abolition of the Klimabonus, general support remained mostly stable compared to support when the dividend was in place. Concurrently, only 33.6\% of residents knew that the tax revenue was now used for the general budget, and up to 25\% incorrectly believed they had received the Klimabonus in 2025. These findings suggest that the low support for carbon pricing with dividends previously reported in the literature might not have been an artifact of low dividend salience. Additional analyses point to the relevance of willingness to drive less and political views as determinants of support for carbon pricing.
Suggested Citation
Rene Schwaiger & Julian Benda & Esther Blanco & Armando Holzknecht & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2026.
"Salient carbon dividends are not enough to generate widespread support for carbon pricing in Austria,"
Working Papers
2026-08, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
Handle:
RePEc:inn:wpaper:2026-08
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inn:wpaper:2026-08. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Judith Courian The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Judith Courian to update the entry or send us the correct address
(email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fuibkat.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.