IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imk/fmmpap/125-2026.html

Capitalism and the polycrisis: bad apples or bad barrel?

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Palley

Abstract

This essay is about the polycrisis, whereby the global order is afflicted by simultaneous crises impacting economics, politics, societal relations, geopolitics, and nature. The essay uses the metaphor of “bad apples” versus “bad barrel” to explain the argument. The “bad apples” explanation views the polycrisis as a series of idiosyncratic crises, and it leaves the free market ideal intact and absolves capitalism. The “bad barrel” explanation sees the polycrisis as being systemically produced, and it contests the free market ideal and identifies capitalism as the driving cause. The Neoliberal era (1980 – present) has surfaced the polycrisis, and the crisis openly revives Luxemburg’s question of “socialism or barbarism?” There is much to be done if society is to avoid a repeat of barbarism. That includes persuasively explaining capitalism’s flaws, articulating the future of socialism, and breaking the chokehold on politics that blocks surfacing these issues. The Chinese proverb is “A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step.” That is true, but we should also seek to ensure the first step is in the right direction. Acknowledging the polycrisis and recognizing it is a product of capitalism’s “bad barrel” does both.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Palley, 2026. "Capitalism and the polycrisis: bad apples or bad barrel?," FMM Working Paper 125-2026, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:imk:fmmpap:125-2026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_fmm_imk_wp_125_2026.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Setterfield, 2020. "Managing the discontent of the losers," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(1), pages 77-97, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark Setterfield, 2024. "Managing the Discontent of the Losers Redux: A Future of Authoritarian Neoliberalism or Social Capitalism?," FMM Working Paper 98-2024, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    2. Mark Setterfield, 2025. "The COVID pandemic and its aftermath: missed opportunities for avoiding a future of Authoritarian Neoliberalism," Working Papers 2510, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics, revised Jun 2026.
    3. van Netten, Jamie, 2023. "The relationship between inequality and bank credit in Australia," Warwick-Monash Economics Student Papers 54, Warwick Monash Economics Student Papers.
    4. Mark Setterfield, 2022. "Neoliberalism: An Entrenched but Exhausted Growth Regime," Ensayos Económicos, Central Bank of Argentina, Economic Research Department, vol. 1(79), pages 131-146, May.
    5. Mark Setterfield, 2026. "A new Authoritarian Neoliberal social structure of accumulation in the United States?," Working Papers 2607, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imk:fmmpap:125-2026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sabine Nemitz (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmbocde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.