IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfscr/2025-311.html

Switzerland: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Technical Note on Systemic Risk Analysis and Stress Testing

Author

Listed:
  • International Monetary Fund

Abstract

This Technical note presents the findings and recommendations of the systemic risk analysis conducted for the Swiss financial system as part of the Switzerland 2025 financial sector assessment program. The analysis intends to help identify the sources of vulnerabilities and systemic risk facing the Swiss financial sector, to inform policy advice and strengthen the resilience of the system to absorb external adverse shocks and to detect and counter endogenously building vulnerabilities of the financial system. The analysis involves various stress test exercises to assess the resilience of the financial system. A holistic vulnerability analysis combines all findings from current conditions and all forward-looking model-based analyses. The stress tests placed emphasis on structural models, given Switzerland’s specific historical macro-financial dynamics. The pension fund sector appears robust, but some uncertainties remain due to data limitations. Despite a difficult market environment and increasing life expectancy, pensions funds have fared well over the last years. Pension fund bankruptcies are rare and have mostly involved small institutions. As a result, gross insolvency payments by the guarantee fund, which have to be financed by the pension sector as a whole, have been low and stable.

Suggested Citation

  • International Monetary Fund, 2025. "Switzerland: Financial Sector Assessment Program-Technical Note on Systemic Risk Analysis and Stress Testing," IMF Staff Country Reports 2025/311, International Monetary Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:imf:imfscr:2025/311
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=572041
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imf:imfscr:2025/311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Akshay Modi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imfffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.