IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/imf/imfscr/2011-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Georgia: Ninth Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement and Request for Waiver of Nonobservance of Performance Criterion: Staff Report; Staff Supplement; Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; and Statement by the Executive Director for Georgia

Author

Listed:
  • International Monetary Fund

Abstract

This is the final review under the Stand-By Arrangement for Georgia. Recent economic developments have been largely in line with the program expectations. Policy targets for the year 2011 have been strengthened. The authorities are in the process of designing a medium-term policy framework to address these challenges. The authorities reiterated their interest in a successor arrangement, but needed time to design their medium-term policy framework before submitting a formal request. The economy is growing at a solid pace, and international reserves have been restored to pre-crisis levels.

Suggested Citation

  • International Monetary Fund, 2011. "Georgia: Ninth Review Under the Stand-By Arrangement and Request for Waiver of Nonobservance of Performance Criterion: Staff Report; Staff Supplement; Press Release on the Executive Board Discussion; ," IMF Staff Country Reports 2011/146, International Monetary Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:imf:imfscr:2011/146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=24990
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Domnisoru, Ciprian., 2012. "Decent work policy options for the Romanian economy," ILO Working Papers 994725643402676, International Labour Organization.
    2. repec:ilo:ilowps:472564 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Costas Christou, 2013. "The dynamics of wage determination in Romania," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 21(4), pages 713-729, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:imf:imfscr:2011/146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Akshay Modi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/imfffus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.