IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ilo/ilowps/995331692502676.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A global fund for social protection lessons from the diverse experiences of global health, agriculture and climate funds

Author

Listed:
  • Yeates, Nicola,
  • Holden, Chris, 1965-
  • Lambin, Roosa,
  • Snell, Carolyn,
  • Idris, Nabila,
  • Mackinder, Sophie,

Abstract

The recent social, ecological and economic crises have not only revealed the gaps in social protection systems across the world, but also drawn global attention to the ways in which international financial architectures have failed to support the development of universal social protection systems and floors. Within this context, this paper examines the idea of a global fund for social protection (GFSP) which has emerged as a potential solution to these structural failings. By drawing on the experiences of seven global funds across the health, climate, and agriculture sectors, the aim of this working paper is to identify key lessons that can guide the possible implementation of a prospective GFSP. Through a careful analysis of the governance structures, norms and standards of these funds, the paper makes certain recommendations to be taken into consideration if a GFSP is to be developed and implemented in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Yeates, Nicola, & Holden, Chris, 1965- & Lambin, Roosa, & Snell, Carolyn, & Idris, Nabila, & Mackinder, Sophie,, 2023. "A global fund for social protection lessons from the diverse experiences of global health, agriculture and climate funds," ILO Working Papers 995331692502676, International Labour Organization.
    • Handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:995331692502676
    DOI: 10.54394/IBBI1570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.54394/IBBI1570
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.54394/IBBI1570?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    social protection; social security financing; medical care; climate change; sustainable agriculture; comparative study;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ilo:ilowps:995331692502676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vesa Sivunen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilounch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.