IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iik/wpaper/200.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Measurement Invariance and the Number of Scale Points in Multi-Item Instruments

Author

Listed:
  • Anandakuttan B Unnithan

    (Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode)

Abstract

Multi-item inventories are widely used in management research to measure latent constructs. Respondents indicate their answers on an agree-disagree scale in response to questions or statements. How many scale points are appropriate in such multi-item instruments is a much debated question. Most of previous research looks at identifying an optimal scale that maximize the reliability as measured by inter-item correlation . However there is little research reported on whether the measurement model and scale characteristics vary with the number of scale points used. In this study, multiple scale configurations using different number of response categories (scale points) are compared using a quasi-experimental research to test whether measurement invariance can be assumed. The results indicate that there is non-invariance between alternate forms as defined by different scale points.This is an important learning both for replication of research as well as in comparison or meta analysis involving several studies with different number of scale points.Researchers must carefully consider this change in scale charactaristics and loadings before they adapt existing inventories with modification in the number if scale points.

Suggested Citation

  • Anandakuttan B Unnithan, 2016. "Measurement Invariance and the Number of Scale Points in Multi-Item Instruments," Working papers 200, Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode.
  • Handle: RePEc:iik:wpaper:200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iimk.ac.in/websiteadmin/FacultyPublications/Working%20Papers/200abs.pdf?t=08
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iik:wpaper:200. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sudheesh Kumar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iikmmin.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.