IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/wpaper/wp23-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Rapid Response Labor Mechanism of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement

Author

Listed:
  • Chad P. Bown

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Kathleen Claussen

    (Georgetown University Law Center)

Abstract

The US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) introduced a new compliance institution for labor rights in trade agreements: the facility-specific Rapid Response Labor Mechanism (RRM). The RRM was developed to tackle one particular thorn in the side of North American integration-labor rights for Mexican workers--which had had detrimental, long-term political-economic consequences for the two countries' trade relationship. This paper reviews the unique political-economic moment in the United States and Mexico that prompted the creation of this tool. It describes how the RRM works and the considerable financial and human resources the two governments have brought to bear to operationalize it. The paper then reports a number of stylized facts on how governments used the RRM during its first three years, largely in the auto sector. It proposes paths of potentially fruitful political-economic research to understand the full implications of the RRM and concludes with preliminary lessons as well as a discussion of the potential for policymakers to transpose facility-specific mechanisms for labor or other issues, such as the environment, into future economic agreements.

Suggested Citation

  • Chad P. Bown & Kathleen Claussen, 2023. "The Rapid Response Labor Mechanism of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement," Working Paper Series WP23-9, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp23-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/working-papers/rapid-response-labor-mechanism-us-mexico-canada-agreement
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    USMCA; RRM; labor; auto industry; unions; collective bargaining; dispute resolution;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:wpaper:wp23-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.