IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb26-9.html

Taking geopolitically motivated US swap lines too far would harm the dollar and Fed independence

Author

Listed:
  • Adnan Mazarei

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Maurice Obstfeld

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

Over the past century, the United States has provided dollar liquidity abroad through both the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve, but the appropriate mode of liquidity injection depends on the economic, financial, and geopolitical contexts. The Treasury is the more appropriate lending conduit when geopolitical concerns dominate, while Fed dollar provision should primarily be targeted toward global stability objectives and be more insulated from short-term foreign policy motives. Up to now, political abuses of these foreign lending channels have been constrained to some degree by laws, norms, and intergovernmental understandings, but adherence can no longer be assumed, so more formal guardrails are needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Adnan Mazarei & Maurice Obstfeld, 2026. "Taking geopolitically motivated US swap lines too far would harm the dollar and Fed independence," Policy Briefs PB26-9, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb26-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/2026/taking-geopolitically-motivated-us-swap-lines-too-far-would-harm
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb26-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.