IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb26-13.html

EU capital requirements on megabanks: The low road or the high road

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Mejino-Lopez

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Nicolas Veron

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

This Policy Brief focuses on capital requirements on the very largest banks, or megabanks, in the context of the broader current EU policy agenda of banking reform. The authors find that, at end-2024, requirements on US megabanks were generally stricter than requirements on EU megabanks, in line with longstanding US practice. A year later under the second Trump administration, US requirements on megabanks were no longer obviously tougher than those in the European Union, but they were not actually undercutting them either. There is thus no reasonable case for the European Union to ease requirements on its own megabanks in response to the current deregulatory drive in the United States. Instead, EU policymakers should prioritize actions to address the current banking policy fragmentation along national lines, even within the euro area. That means completing the unfinished banking union and integrating decision making on macroprudential buffers at the European Central Bank, which will make the banking policy framework significantly simpler and more predictable.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Mejino-Lopez & Nicolas Veron, 2026. "EU capital requirements on megabanks: The low road or the high road," Policy Briefs PB26-13, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb26-13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/2026/eu-capital-requirements-megabanks-low-road-or-high-road
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb26-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.