IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb25-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does a weak social safety net hold back private consumption in China?

Author

Listed:
  • Nicholas R. Lardy

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

Many experts see China's economy as constrained because of a weak social safety net, especially the retirement system, resulting in anemic domestic consumption spending. This view is out of date. Recent data indicate that China has expanded many parts of its social safety net and that consumption spending has accelerated. Social expenditures in China have more than doubled as a share of GDP since 2010 and are on par with Mexico and Turkey. But given China's aging population, safety net spending and domestic consumption spending will need to expand further to put China's economy on a more sustainable path. The latest data should clear the cobwebs of misunderstanding that have led to both complacency and unnecessary alarm about China's economic prospects among observers in the United States and other countries. China's government is hardly unaware of the importance of stronger household consumption and has announced policies to increase consumer spending, including more generous pension benefits for farmers and rural migrant workers. If these initiatives are implemented, the growth of household consumption is likely to accelerate.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicholas R. Lardy, 2025. "Does a weak social safety net hold back private consumption in China?," Policy Briefs PB25-7, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb25-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/2025/does-weak-social-safety-net-hold-back-private-consumption-china
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb25-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.