IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/iie/pbrief/pb18-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The European Union’s Proposed Digital Services Tax: A De Facto Tariff

Author

Listed:
  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Zhiyao (Lucy) Lu

    (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

Abstract

Over the past three years, the European Union has sought various ways to curb tax avoidance practices and collect more revenue from an array of US multinational corporations (MNCs), triggering disputes with some of the giants in the field. Now the European Commission is looking to tax MNCs’ digital earnings. It has proposed a digital services tax (DST), which would tax the part of a digital firm’s revenues attributed to European member states, and a digital profits tax, which would tax the slice of corporate profits derived in member states. These new tax proposals arise in a general European atmosphere of distrust towards highly successful US firms, exemplified by attacks on US digital firms over privacy issues and concerns that tech giants may be defying EU competition policy standards. Many US MNCs in the digital industry, such as Google and Facebook, may be subject to the proposed taxes. Hufbauer and Lu argue that the DST has the characteristics of a prohibited tariff under the rules of the World Trade Organization. They suggest several countermeasures the United States could pursue if the European Union moves forward with implementing the DST.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Zhiyao (Lucy) Lu, 2018. "The European Union’s Proposed Digital Services Tax: A De Facto Tariff," Policy Briefs PB18-15, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb18-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/european-unions-proposed-digital-services-tax-de-facto-tariff
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erik van der Marel, 2021. "Digital‐based Services Globalization and Multilateral Trade Cooperation," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 12(3), pages 392-398, May.
    2. Kudrle, Robert T., 2021. "Moves and countermoves in the digitization challenges to international taxation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb18-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peterson Institute webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iieeeus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.