IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

NAFTA Renegotiation: US Offensive and Defensive Interests vis-à-vis Canada


  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer

    () (Peterson Institute for International Economics)

  • Euijin Jung

    () (Peterson Institute for International Economics)


Previous US administrations—whether Republican or Democrat—have focused on reducing barriers to trade and investment during trade negotiations, but the Trump administration will prioritize reducing the US trade deficit when it renegotiates the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). Trump will seek to lower Canadian barriers to US exports and oppose changes that would lower US barriers to Canadian exports. The authors identify well-known US and Canadian trade barriers and speculate on possible “blockbuster” demands that the Trump trade team might make on Canada in keeping with Trump’s concept of unfair trade (e.g., border tax adjustment, rules of origin, and currency undervaluation). NAFTA renegotiation gives the Trump administration an opportunity to resolve longstanding trade grievances with Canada, provided the United States makes its own concessions. Both countries can benefit from updating NAFTA to address issues not foreseen in the early 1990s, such as digital commerce and state-owned enterprises. But US insistence on “blockbuster” demands could put not only the talks but also the entire relationship between Ottawa and Washington at risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Gary Clyde Hufbauer & Euijin Jung, 2017. "NAFTA Renegotiation: US Offensive and Defensive Interests vis-à-vis Canada," Policy Briefs PB17-22, Peterson Institute for International Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb17-22

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb17-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Peterson Institute webmaster). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.